Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unmistakable (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PeaceNT (talk) 06:49, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
"Unverifiable" is more like it. I couldn't find a single source that could verify the track listing, or anything else about this album besides its lead-off single and initial release date -- and I don't think that either of those is enough for a whole page on the album. Given Jo Dee's recent lack of hits, and given Curb's track record (still waiting on that Amy Dalley album), I would be deliciously surprised (couldn't resist) if this ever saw the light of day at all. (Update: Apparently it's been shelved.) Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:37, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I couldn't even find any information about the album on Curb Records own site. With no references, I'm going to have to say it's time for this article to go. I also can't help but notice that this article is the editor's one and only contribution to the encyclopedia - smells a little like COI to me. Trusilver (talk) 17:56, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – Interestingly enough, for an unreleased album, has received reliable, verifiable and notable coverage as shown here [1] and here [2]. Shoessss | Chat 18:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sorry, but I just don't see a reliable source that is specifically about the album in question. This says that the album was shelved, but only mentions it in passing. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please look at the additional articles shown, I believe you will find enough for a keep vote. Thanks Shoessss | Chat 18:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I already have looked at all the Google News sources. Some featured unrelated use of the word "unmistakable" with no mention of the album; the rest were only passing mentions. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:47, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- For the benefit of everyone - since this is a discussion and not a vote - you should link them, because personally I'm not seeing them TheBilly (talk) 18:57, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, just for the record, these three articles are the only Google News hits that actually refer to the album itself; all of them do so only in passing. The other Google News hits simply use "unmistakable" as an adjective to describe something else in the article. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:21, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry about that, I meant to reply to "Shoesssss" there but I must have typed too many ":"s. I meant to ask him to link the non-trivial mentions, since I wasn't seeing them TheBilly (talk) 11:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, just for the record, these three articles are the only Google News hits that actually refer to the album itself; all of them do so only in passing. The other Google News hits simply use "unmistakable" as an adjective to describe something else in the article. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:21, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- For the benefit of everyone - since this is a discussion and not a vote - you should link them, because personally I'm not seeing them TheBilly (talk) 18:57, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I already have looked at all the Google News sources. Some featured unrelated use of the word "unmistakable" with no mention of the album; the rest were only passing mentions. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:47, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please look at the additional articles shown, I believe you will find enough for a keep vote. Thanks Shoessss | Chat 18:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The mentions referred to above are trivial mentions. They're basically "this woman works really hard. She was working on a new album and reluctantly shelved it". There are no secondary sources presented which focus on the album or give it significant attention TheBilly (talk) 18:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Blogspot, You-tube, the artist's own web page... the only reliable sources I can find just mention the album in passing, with little or no real information. I don't see anything non-trivial. Could certainly be re-created after the album is released and reviewed by real sources. Kafziel Talk 21:37, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The track listing is unsourced and there is little to suggest this is going to ever be any more than a stub. Not enough coverage for a notable album. Most of the info is already adequately contained in her main article. --neonwhite user page talk 02:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom; notability & WP:RS issues. Eusebeus (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 18:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the references found are mentions in passing in the context of a larger article about the artist. -- Whpq (talk) 16:16, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.