Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/39/20 Alliance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 20:19, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

39/20 Alliance

AfDs for this article:

39/20 Alliance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No third party sources beyond news indicating notability, no similar alliances to establish precedent. 117Avenue (talk) 02:12, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

• Organization of purely local notability, with little substance beyond cursory documentation of its existence, and not nearly enough sourcing, to suggest any reason why an international encyclopedia should maintain an article about it. Of the sources cited here, half are primary sources which cannot confer notability, and the other half are local community newsweeklies that aren't widely distributed enough to satisfy WP:GNG if they're the best you can do for sourcing. An organization like this might clear the bar if it accomplished something that was getting it into the Calgary Herald, The Province, the Toronto Star or The Globe and Mail on a regular basis — but if the Leduc Rep is your strongest possible source, then you just haven't satisfied Wikipedia's inclusion standards. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 16:17, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:08, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:08, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:08, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:08, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

• Delete this article about a non-notable intermunicipal economic development alliance. Hwy43 (talk) 05:01, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:03, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

• Delete I agree with nominator's reasosns above. New Media Theorist (talk) 05:29, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.